posted by Anonymous on Jan 30, 2009
Have you every wondered just what exactly is in Barack Obama's massive government spending plan, now estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to end up costing over $1 trillion?
The creators of StimulusWatch.org have taken the proposals from the U.S. Conference of Mayors that may end up in the stimulus bill, and broken it down by project. The sheer amount of high-cost, low-job creation pork-barrel spending is amazing.
posted by Anonymous on Jan 29, 2009
No wonder President Barack Obama is demanding the Senate pass his $825 billion government expansion plan with no further study or debate. Evenly divided a week ago, independents are now turning against Obama's $825 billion government expansion plan.
Judging from the polling data, the only thing preventing Obama's government expansion plan from dipping into Bush-approval-rating territory is monolithic support from Democrats, which is above and beyond bad news for a "unifier" president only a little over a week into the job.
posted by Anonymous on Jan 29, 2009
Syndicated columnist Michelle Malkin is staying busy these days keeping track of some of the more wasteful items included in President Obama's government spending plan. Pitched as a plan to create jobs, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office now estimates its final cost will top $1 trillion, and most of the spending has little to do with creating jobs.
posted by Anonymous on Jan 28, 2009
The Politico today reports when interest costs are added to the $825 billion government spending plan proposed by President Barack Obaama, the total costs to taxpayers could top $1 trillion.
In a letter to Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), ranking member of the House Budget Committee, Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf reports the interest cost would be $347 billion over 10 years, meaning the $825 billion plan could cost as much as $1.172 trillion.
posted by Anonymous on Jan 27, 2009
The Washington Examiner challenges Barack Obama to turn his pretty words about "change" and "hard choices" into some kind of real action.
posted by Anonymous on Jan 27, 2009
If your carry-on bag is sitting on the bottom of the Hudson River right now, The Washington Examiner suggests New York senator Chuck Schumer may be partially to blame.
posted by Anonymous on Jan 26, 2009
What do you get when the government begins providing all child care, education and health care?
You get a government that begins to look at its citizens as an expensive burden. The Drudge Report highlights this exchange Sunday between This Week host George Stephanopoulos and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on some of the more ridiculous items in the so-called "stimulus package."
STEPHANOPOULOS: Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family planning services. How is that stimulus?
posted by Anonymous on Jan 25, 2009
Constancy of government intrusion unlikely to change
By Bob Barr
For the Journal-Constitution
Read the entire column for yourself at The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
"Clearly, much has changed since the early spring of 2008. But, as I scan the news, there remains an eerie constancy to goings on in Washington, in Atlanta and elsewhere.
posted by Anonymous on Jan 24, 2009
A 43-year-old man with Down’s syndrome painfully starved to death for 26 days after doctors in Britain’s socialized National Health Service simply forgot to feed him.
Martin Ryan died, according to The Daily Mail, “starving and in agony” in an NHS hospital after doctors failed to give him a feeding tube. Ryan had difficulties communicating with doctors, which led to him suffering a slow and brutal death from starvation.
posted by Austin Petersen on Jan 24, 2009
It’s common to hear today from Americans that “if we knew then what we know today, we should never have gone to Vietnam. “ Even my father who served as a Green Beret and who agreed with the Iraq invasion visits his friends names at the Vietnam Memorial with a tear in his eye and regret in his voice.
Pages