Days Until General Election:
            
Join the LP!
Get Involved!


Run for Office!


 
LP Blog
The official blog of the Libertarian Party



January 05, 2006

Senator Clinton's 2000 Fundraising Committee Fined

A $35,000 fine was levied against a fundraising committee for Senator Hillary Clinton's 2000 election campaign by the Federal Election Commission. The fine was a direct result of Andrew Grossman, who, acting in the capacity of the committee's treasurer, had underreported more than $700,000 in donations raised from a Hollywood celebrity concert fundraiser. The event was held on August 13, 2000 and featured celebrities such as Jennifer Aniston, Cher and Muhammad Ali.

The major financial backer of the fundraiser, Peter Paul, had three felony and fraud convictions from the 1970s and 1980s. Shortly after the celebrity fundraiser, the FBI launched an investigation into Paul's claims that he paid nearly $2 million in expenses for the event, which was far more than originally reported by Clinton's fundraising committee, the New York Sun reported.

Senator Clinton has tried to distance herself from the fundraising scandal, stating she was not involved with the inaccurate reporting. Marc Elias, a lawyer for Hillary Clinton, said the agreement with the Federal Election Commission "makes clear that there was no violation of federal election law by the Hillary Rodham Clinton for Senate Committee in connection with the August 13, 2000 event." Yet in the text of the conciliation agreement, it states the Federal Election Commission conducted an investigation and found "probable cause to believe New York Senate 2000 and Andrew Grossman, in his official capacity as treasurer," violated campaign election law.

Paul himself disputes Clinton's claims that she was not involved in the inaccurate reporting. Paul said, "For Hillary to say she had nothing to do with this, again, is disingenuous." He further added, "This is the biggest contribution to her campaign." Paul claimed letters and legal papers he sent to Clinton's attorney included canceled checks showing Paul's expenses for the fundraising concert, yet the campaign continued to reaffirm the reports that omitted those expenses. Paul claimed, "Not only did they ignore them, they hid them."

RedState.org has their take on the story and links to the actual text of the conciliatory agreement.

Posted by at January 5, 2006 03:34 PM

Reader Comments:

Clearly both Democrats and Republicans are major offendors of the rules they are supposed to follow, including the Constitution. I dare say that in Texas, although we don't necessarily like these rules, we seem to comply with them better than the other guys. Our executive director Wes Benedict ran for city council in Austin, and his campaign treasurer Art DiBianca found numerous ethics reporting violations from others in the races as well as current office holders.

If the Libertarian Party can offer a candidate in 2008 that has more ethical appeal than Hillary, there may be a lot of support for us. Someone like Dr Mary Ruwart could be the margin of defeat for the Hildebeast!

Patrick Dixon
Chair, LP of Texas
www.LPTexas.org
www.PatDixon.org

Posted by: Patrick Dixon at January 5, 2006 05:03 PM

I would like to see that for 2008, but congress needs to be full of libertarians as well.

Posted by: at January 5, 2006 05:50 PM

Didn't Mary Ruwart write a column on LewRockwell a long time back about how she realized she was an anarchist ?

Karen Kwiatowski seems to see the need for a state. She has my backing.

Posted by: at January 5, 2006 07:04 PM

I saw this news earlier today (actually, I suppose that would be earlier yesterday). It is of course not surprising, but the ex-President and her husband have done so much big stuff that they've ended up being able to skate on. That sucks; if it had been Republicans, the media would've been much harder on them - as would their fellow party members.

By the way, I wanted to mention that I wasn't aware that the national LP website (which I linked to in a comment posting at another weblog just today - I mean, yesterday) now had a weblog at it, which was open for commenting. Nice addition to the site. Please keep up the watch and commentary of the Democrats and Republicans.

Posted by: Aakash at January 6, 2006 04:28 AM

And this comes as a suprise to anyone after Whitewater? The Dems. are just as conniving as the Reps. The only difference between the two are the special interest groups they pander to for contributions

Posted by: Stephen R at January 6, 2006 09:17 AM
 


Blog Archives
 Judge strikes down parts of Patriot Act

 South L.A. regulates health

 Iraqis think 'surge' has failed

 D.C. files appeal to SCOTUS

 The national emergency dictator

 LNC Staff Member in Washington Post

 Internal DOJ probe sets sights on Gonzales

 GAO report undermines tales of improvement in Iraq

 America's Economic Disaster

 Police face ammunition shortage



By Month:
 September 2007

 August 2007

 July 2007

 June 2007

 May 2007

 April 2007

 March 2007

 February 2007

 January 2007

 December 2006

 November 2006

 October 2006

 September 2006

 August 2006

 July 2006

 June 2006

 May 2006

 April 2006

 March 2006

 February 2006

 January 2006

 December 2005

 November 2005

 October 2005

 September 2005

 August 2005

 July 2005

 June 2005

 May 2005

 April 2005


LP State Orgs
Search LP.org
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. - 2008 - Privacy Policy
Paid for by the Libertarian National Committee -- 2600 Virginia Ave, N.W. Suite 200, Washington D.C. 20037 -- 1-800-Elect-Us
Content not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee