Days Until General Election:
            
Donate to the LP!
Get Involved!


Ballot Access '08 Campaign


 
LP Blog
The official blog of the Libertarian Party



June 26, 2006

Supreme Court Sides With Free Speech in Vermont Campaign Finance Case

The U.S. Supreme Court finally sided with free speech in a case that challenged Vermont's campaign finance law.

A majority of the Supreme Court justices felt the law went too far (via Washington Post):

"The Supreme Court ruled Monday that Vermont's limits on contributions and spending in political campaigns are too low and improperly hinder the ability of candidates to raise money and speak to voters."

The spending limits imposed by Vermont's campaign finance law were ridiculously low (via Washington Post):

"In 1997, Vermont passed its campaign finance law, placing a $300,000 spending cap on gubernatorial candidates and lesser limits for other state political contests. Contributions to state campaigns were limited to as little as $200 per election cycle for state House races."

Various groups were involved in challenging the constitutionality of Vermont's campaign finance law, including the Vermont Libertarian Party, the Vermont Right to Life Committee and the Vermont Republican State Committee.

Here is what the Vermont Libertarian Party Chair, Hardy Machia had to say about Monday's Supreme Court ruling:

"It's a huge win for the Libertarian Party of Vermont. The ruling will help Libertarians in Vermont by allowing them to raise enough money to compete with the two entrenched parties."

You can read the Vermont LP's press release about Monday's ruling here. You can also check out their original press releases regarding their fight against the state campaign finance law, here and here.

Posted by at June 26, 2006 05:19 PM

Reader Comments:

This was the correct ruling based on free speech.

But what should actually be done is a law which outlaws bribes, through a change in legal presumptions.

In the drug war, if you get busted with 4 ounces of weed, the law presumes you are a drug dealer. No one has to prove you're a dealer.

Likewise, giving $500 or more to an elected official should be presumed bribery.

It's not charity because it's not tax deductible.

It doesn't violate free speech because you can spend all the money you want promoting candidates.

Of course, bribery does not apply to challengers who are not elected officials.

Posted by: Galileo at June 26, 2006 09:28 PM

The Vermont Libertarian Party, now has a press release available about the ruling, which also includes audio commentary from our state chair, Hardy Machia, about the decision. For more info, visit our site: www.vtlp.org

Posted by: Heavenly at June 27, 2006 06:39 PM
 


Blog Archives
 Judge strikes down parts of Patriot Act

 South L.A. regulates health

 Iraqis think 'surge' has failed

 D.C. files appeal to SCOTUS

 The national emergency dictator

 LNC Staff Member in Washington Post

 Internal DOJ probe sets sights on Gonzales

 GAO report undermines tales of improvement in Iraq

 America's Economic Disaster

 Police face ammunition shortage



By Month:
 September 2007

 August 2007

 July 2007

 June 2007

 May 2007

 April 2007

 March 2007

 February 2007

 January 2007

 December 2006

 November 2006

 October 2006

 September 2006

 August 2006

 July 2006

 June 2006

 May 2006

 April 2006

 March 2006

 February 2006

 January 2006

 December 2005

 November 2005

 October 2005

 September 2005

 August 2005

 July 2005

 June 2005

 May 2005

 April 2005


LP State Orgs
Search LP.org
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. - 2008 - Privacy Policy
Paid for by the Libertarian National Committee -- 2600 Virginia Ave, N.W. Suite 200, Washington D.C. 20037 -- 1-800-Elect-Us
Content not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee