Days Until General Election:
            
Donate to the LP!
Get Involved!


LP Community - MySpace, MeetUp.com and more!
LP Community - MySpace, MeetUp.com and more!


 
LP Blog
The official blog of the Libertarian Party



June 29, 2006

MMJ Update

While the Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment failed again, it picked up some new votes. Here's the take from MPP:

An amendment to stop the U.S. Justice Department from arresting medical marijuana patients in the 11 states where medical marijuana is legal received a record vote on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives today. Although the measure failed to pass, 163-259, medical marijuana advocates hailed the record vote as the result of a growing groundswell of support for medical marijuana from across the political spectrum. Last summer, the amendment received 161 votes, which was the previous record until today's vote.

The improvement was due to Republican "yes" votes, which increased from 15 last year to 18 this year.

"Support for medical marijuana has hit yet another high-water mark in Congress, 11 states have legalized medical marijuana in 11 years, and the latest national poll shows that an astounding 78 percent of voters want to see medical marijuana legal," said Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project (MPP) in Washington, D.C. "It's hard to imagine a scenario where Congress will not pass our medical marijuana legislation by, say, 2009.

We're gaining votes each time the bill comes up for vote. We even gained some in the middle of the election season, which indicates we'll get even more next year. Let's continue keep up the pressure on this good piece of legislation.

Posted by Stephen Gordon at June 29, 2006 02:22 PM

Reader Comments:

I just read through the CSA and several other pieces of federal drug policy... I'm absolutely shocked at the lack of constitutional authority. I'd never really thought about it before, just figured it had been interpreted with the "general welfare" aspect, but maybe I've turned a corner or something, but I cannot accept that argument. It seems weak at best.

I read on Wikipedia (which is always suspect) that cannabis is on Schedule I, meaning it has a high chance of abuse and little medicinal purpose, but I believe on the DEA webpage there is no cannabis, just "marihuana," which is, I believe, on Schedule III. Does anyone know anything more about this?

I started coming to this blog two days ago, and I think I'm already becoming more libertarian than I already was, a shift due in no small part to drug information and policy.

Posted by: Marcus Brutus at June 29, 2006 05:52 PM

Welcome, Marcus Brutus.

Posted by: Frank Martinez at June 30, 2006 12:02 PM
 


Blog Archives
 Judge strikes down parts of Patriot Act

 South L.A. regulates health

 Iraqis think 'surge' has failed

 D.C. files appeal to SCOTUS

 The national emergency dictator

 LNC Staff Member in Washington Post

 Internal DOJ probe sets sights on Gonzales

 GAO report undermines tales of improvement in Iraq

 America's Economic Disaster

 Police face ammunition shortage



By Month:
 September 2007

 August 2007

 July 2007

 June 2007

 May 2007

 April 2007

 March 2007

 February 2007

 January 2007

 December 2006

 November 2006

 October 2006

 September 2006

 August 2006

 July 2006

 June 2006

 May 2006

 April 2006

 March 2006

 February 2006

 January 2006

 December 2005

 November 2005

 October 2005

 September 2005

 August 2005

 July 2005

 June 2005

 May 2005

 April 2005


LP State Orgs
Search LP.org
Libertarian National Committee, Inc. - 2008 - Privacy Policy
Paid for by the Libertarian National Committee -- 2600 Virginia Ave, N.W. Suite 200, Washington D.C. 20037 -- 1-800-Elect-Us
Content not authorized by any candidate or candidate committee