Boston has seen a large surge in violence within the last year. Consequently, there have been more make-shift memorials erected in memory of the victims.
City officials are considering restrictions on the make-shift memorials (via Boston Globe):
For some residents, they are powerful symbols, akin to gravesites, where friends and relatives often pay tribute and tend them faithfully for years. But officials increasingly worry about sites that have become large gathering spots, littered with beer bottles and, occasionally, evidence of gang rivalries and simmering rage.
If known gang members are gathering at these memorials, doesn't that just make it easier to arrest them?
Some feel that the city's proposed restrictions on memorials could backfire (via Boston Globe):
Clementina M. Chery - founder of the Louis D. Brown Peace Institute, an outreach organization for those bereaved by homicide - said that the memorials give family and community members a way to express their grief and that removing them too early could create "more chaos than anything."
"If it's removed forcefully, the family is going to put it back up; there's going to be a tug of war," she said. "Memorials are a way of healing. When that is interrupted, it delays the healing process."
I cannot help but agree with this to the extent of these so-called memorials being placed on public property, namely road rights of way. Public property should not be a place for someone to nail a cross into the ground and light candles (even if it is not the religious excercise by a right wing nut but a griveing family member) as we all know there is to be a STRICT seperation of church and state here. What should really be pointed out here is the true cost to the taxpayers of running weed wackers around all this crap that people have put on the side of the road.
Private property is another matter entirely. If you want to nail in a cross, light candles and dance in little circles, be my guest.
I agree with Keith. Not on public property, but on private property. An exception to this might be a public memorial to homicide victims, similar to the Vietnam war memorial. Each time a new death occurs, put that person's name on the monument. Then again you get back to government regulation.
Sounds like a great opportunity for someone in Boston LP or Mass LP to write a Letter to the Editor of the Boston Globe tying in many of these deaths to the failed War on Drugs.
Posted by: Creech at July 31, 2006 03:33 PM