- Home
- Membership
- Our Party
- Issues
- Action
- Elections
- Contact Us
- States
- Alabama
- Florida
- Louisiana
- Nebraska
- Oklahoma
- Vermont
- Alaska
- Georgia
- Maine
- Nevada
- Oregon
- Virginia
- Arizona
- Hawaii
- Maryland
- New Hampshire
- Pennsylvania
- Washington
- Arkansas
- Idaho
- Massachusetts
- New Jersey
- Rhode Island
- West Virginia
- California
- Illinois
- Michigan
- New Mexico
- South Carolina
- Wisconsin
- Colorado
- Indiana
- Minnesota
- New York
- South Dakota
- Wyoming
- Connecticut
- Iowa
- Mississippi
- North Carolina
- Tennessee
- Delaware
- Kansas
- Missouri
- North Dakota
- Texas
- District of Columbia
- Kentucky
- Montana
- Ohio
- Utah
- Español
Blogs
You can't spoil an election if the other choices are rotten
LP Texas chairman Pat Dixon speaks about "spoiling" in the Texas Tribune, January 25, 2010:
Dixon doesn’t care if his candidates take votes away from the major parties. You can’t spoil an election if the mainstream parties are already rotten, he says. “[Spoiling] would be a concern if there were candidates on the ballot on either the Democratic or Republican parties who were really close enough that we would rather have them in office,” he said. Dixon pointed to the fact that Libertarians often do not run against U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, who represents the more libertarian element of the Republican Party, and who was the Libertarian Party candidate for president in 1988. Ironically, this year a Libertarian will be challenging Paul for his seat.

